Editorial Standards

Define the scope

Every OvZuno publication states the subjects it covers, the audience it serves, and the adjacent subjects it intentionally excludes.

Prefer checkable evidence

Technical claims should be supported by primary documentation, standards, regulatory material, direct data, or clearly identified expert evidence. Secondary sources may provide context but should not become an invisible chain of repetition.

Separate fact, interpretation, and limitation

Articles should distinguish documented facts from editorial analysis. Important assumptions, operating conditions, and limitations belong near the conclusion they qualify.

Correct material errors

Substantive corrections should be made promptly. An article receives a lastmod value only after a meaningful, verified change—not because the site was rebuilt or the publication date was reused.

Keep authorship honest

OvZuno does not invent named experts, reviewers, credentials, test results, or field experience. Organizational authorship is used when work is produced collectively.

Disclose support

Partner-supported work is labelled in plain language. Support does not give a partner control over editorial conclusions. See the full Publication Disclosure.